? Program
? Framework conditions for innovation
?️ 28 september 2022
?14:45-15:30(GMT+02:00)
- Framework conditions : regulations to balance the need to protect and the need to innovate
- Deep Tech Innovations + Green Transition calls for a more responsable framework and adaptable regulations
- Discussion between public authorities, private innovators and eu representatives
Do we need expertimentation spaces for testing innovations ?
Ana Barjasic, Board Member | European Innovation Council
- main beneficiaries are innovators, policy makers and investors
- reduces project risk, help for commercializing innovation
- but not all innovators have access to theses spaces → ressources and access must b
- policy makers can also benefit → testing solutions for smart procurement (ex: swedish national test beds?)
- challenge making things happen on an EU level: ⚠️ launch of govtech incubator next year to foster cross-border collaboration ⚠️
- risk is reduced for potential investors
- consumers can also test innovations in a controlled environment and
- behavioral science used to
Peter (?)
- EU has good regulations that make the playing field level for innovators
- Need to foment more entrepreneurship in every sandbox
- Favor young people in innovation ecosystems
How can innovation procurement facilitate uptake of innovations?
Michael Dritsas, Head of Cabinet Office of the Dep. Minister (Dr Dimas) | Ministry of Development and Investments
- National startup registry Elevate Greece + National Competence Center
- Networking and collaborations with the public sector and EU entities
Nathalie Berger, Director – Directorate B support to reforms to MS | European Commission – DG REFORM
- Technical Support Instrument → tool linked to the EU Next Generation
- Policy support instrument used with the technical support instrument are meant to work together either simultaneously or in succession
- We provide technical support to the design and implementation of reforms in all areas of the economy including R&I
- The support is available on request to member states through the instrument
? From lab to market: connecting research, technology and innovation
?️ 29 september 2022
?11:00-11:45(GMT+02:00)
Nektarios Tavernarakis, Chair of the EIT Governing Board | EIT European Institute for Innovation and Technology
- EIT Governing Board : success built on sustainable business in Knowledge and Innovation communities (industries, researchers, and innovators)
- Master and PhD training programs + support to start-ups and “unicorns” (ex: INSEP in France)
- partnership with other EU complementary programs : ERC + EIC (?) other Horizon Europe instruments
- fastr track mechanism for start-ups in place
- European Innovation Agenda : deeptech needs new skills
- EIT mandated to lead flagship measure to foster next generation skills : synergies between EU funding schemes (Marie Curie Fellowships + ERC + EIC + EIT)
Maria Leptin, President | European Research Council
- Researchers know what they are doing → knoweldge is out there and giving researchers freedom to follow their scientific dreams pays off (ex: covid vaccine)
- Funding basic curiosity-driven research is important : complementarity between basic and applied science
- ERC grants support broad exploration
- EIC Proof-of-Concept grants help testing solutions by ERC grantees
- ERC funded work is highly cited in patents and journals
Mark Ferguson, Chairman of the Board | European Innovation Council
- complementarity ERC + EIT + EIC : from great ideas to successful products through accelerator program for start-ups to scale up
- ERC supports basic research —> can lead to commercialisation —> EIT transition program —> EIC accelerator program
- Program to provide internships to EIC + EIT + Maria Sklodowska grantees to work in startups
- Gender initiatives through all three programs to promote more women in tech & innovation
Jose Capmany, Professor | Universtitat Politecnica de Valencia/ iPronics Programmable Photonics
- Photonic processor received ERC advance grant
- ERC grant is more flexible than
? Education and innovation for skills development: empowering the next generation
?️ 29 september 2022
?11:00-11:45(GMT+02:00)
Klavdija Kutnar, Rector – University of Primorska (Slovenia)
- Context: New strategy for european universities
- Life-long learning key for EU vision
- hard to make big changes for a young, small university —> Internationalization strategy (45 differernt countries)
- member of Innovative Higher Education Institutions Network
Tiziana Lippiello, Member | European network of Innovative Higher Education Institutions
- need to value our cutural heritage and combine it with innovation (upscale + new competencies for students)
- within the european alliance, work is done on european values and exchange good practices, we should do more to include students
- there should be more inter-government dialogues and alliances between programs
- change mindset from competitive to callaborative
- synergies between vocation schools and higher education institutions —> combine EU funds with national funds
Mariya Gabriel, Commissioner for Innovation, Research, Culture, Education and Youth
- closer the higher education and innovation systems are, closer we are to achieving our goals
- 44 EU university alliances exist —> they have more sustainable funding —> this momentum has to be used
- 3 other flagships : european degree + innovation agenda —> we need to take up the pace
- status of eu alliances : european network of european universities —> open up to regional universities
- alliances used to stay amongs themselves —> they need to work together
- 6 alliances created a common incubator for rural areas in Spain
- Euoprean innovation agenda : new training scheme for researchers to go into companies and companies get access to data through researchers
- we need common initiatives between alliances to drive these funds and innovative tools
? Enhancing trust in science: a conversation with researchers
?️ 29 september 2022
?14:00-14:45(GMT+02:00)
Angela Liberatore, Head of the Scientific Department | European Research Council
- ERC grants allow scientists decide what to work on (academic freedom)
- Spoiler alert : Citizen Science event on December 7th 2022
- Bringing research to the public : European researcher’s night in 25 countries !
Tomomi Fushiya, Associate professor | University of Warsaw
- Collaborative archeaologie, meeting point for researchers and the public
- science communication focused on archeology to gain trust in local communities → misunderstanding in broadcasting scientific knowledge since colonialism
- integrated community knowledge into science methodology
- public engagement award
Aurélie Lacroix, Senior Scientist II | Sixfold Bioscience
- cancer research
- joined company as a Marie Curie Sklodowska felllow
- Pint of Science + science jounralism degree + PhD
Gian Maria Greco, Board Member (MCAA) and Senior Research Fellow (UniMC) | Marie Curie Alumni Association (MCAA) and University of Macerata (UniMC)
- accessibility studies in communication + media for diverse public in terms of culture, language, (dis)ability → form over content
- Communication working group of the Marie Curie Sklodowska alumni assocation
Jacob Sherson, Center for Hybrid Intelligence, Aarhus University
- Science at home → natural science challenges that were turned into games that the general public participated in
- Another set of games were Social Science based (ex: cognitive profiling in a democratic way)
- Hybrid intelligence + Games for Good : public engagement + democracy
Benefits & challenges of bringing research to society ?
Jacob Sherson
- Concrete problems have been solved by citizen engagemetn in science
- Citizen science has a set of core values that are important for the future of research : openness, transparency, etc.
- Human-centered AI solutions are hard to create → citizen science has a unique sense of value for every participant, it creates meaning
Tomomi
- archaeology is being challenged today about its colonial history
- social responsibility for researchers working in the field is to connect with local communities
What are your motivations for doing citizen science ?
Aurélie
- as a scientist, citizen science made me feel more useful for the community → for scientists there is a lot to gain
- discussions with patient associations are very important for the health field to counter-balance the data driven approaches
- outreach helps the public make informed decisions
- there are many scientists present at outreach events → need to diversify to really reach citizens accross groups
What can be done to improve engagement ?
Jacob Sherson
- building bridges to engage with citizens
- projects should be valued in terms of impact and not in terms of potential publication
- using games, we can generate crowdsourced opinion on a large number of society issues
Tomomi
- archaelogy has been doing science communication for a long time (museums, guide books, etc.) but outreach for engagement of local communities is not so common
- a lot of cultural knowledge has been accumulating for generations that deserves to be integrated into scientific communication
Aurélie
- create trust, not only convey information to an audience → often missing for now
- talking to people who are less aware of science through community-leaders who can be vectors for information
- making science more inclusive and diversifying our tools to improve the honesty around the scientific method
Gian Maria
- trust in science or faith in science ?
How do we respect citizen demands for better information, while acknowledging years of peer review and quality control in research processes ?
EU Mission on Cancer: focus on needs of young cancer survivors
?️ 29 september 2022
?14:00-14:45(GMT+02:00)
Rob Pieters, Chief Medical Officer | Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
- treatments for cancer vary depending on age group
- focus groups have been created for survivors of specific cancers to gather data about quality of life to adapt threatments
- survivors are key to understanding side-effects of treatments on the long term
- understanding the difference between individuals and how they react to treatments and long-term toxicities according to genetic profiles
Carina Ferreira-Borges, Regional Office for Europe | WHO
- investment to ensure correct information is given to health care providers
- cultural insights shoul dbe used to help health care providers to understand youth cancer
- networks should be created to support prevention efforts, enabling environments for youth survivors and more protective policies (psycho-social support)
- WHO has seen inequalities in access to cancer treatments
Tiago Costa, Patient Advocate | Childhood Cancer International – Europe (CCI-E)
- engagment with survivors and youth networks must be increased in european projects
- long-term follow-up and hte socio-economic rights of surviviors
- upcoming conferrence on young cancer survivors
Summary
→ not forgetting care-givers
→ long-term follow-up (tools + infrastructure)
→ cancer survivors must be involved
→ address inequalities
→ new treatments need to be discovered
→ mental health needs to be addressed
→ ⚠️ next year: conference on how to address the needs ot cancer survivors ⚠️